District : South 24 Parganas.
IN
THE COURT OF THE LEARNED DISTRICT SESSION JUDGE AT ALIPORE, SOUTH 24 PARGANAS
Criminal
Revisional Jurisdiction
Cr. Motion
no. _____________of 2020
In the
matter of :
An application
under Section 399, and 397 of the Criminal Procedure Code’ 1973;
A N D
In the matter of :
An application
against an order dated 27th September’ 2019, passed by Smt. A.
Chatterjee, Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court, Alipore, South 24
Parganas, in A.C.M. Case no. 834 of 2018, under Section 125 of the Criminal
Procedure Code’ 1973;
AND
In the matter of :
Md. Shakil @ Md.
Aqeel Asrari, Son of Md. Ayub Asrari, of T-170, Mitha Talab, Post Office –
Badartala, Police Station – Rajabagan, Kolkata - 700013.
_________Revisionist.
-
Versus
–
1. Saba Afreen, Wife of Md. Shakil
@ Md. Aqeel Asrari, daughter of Md. Shabbir, presently residing at Z-5/238/70A,
Bagdi Para Road, Post Office – Badartala, Police Station – Nadial, Kolkata -
700044, District – South 24 Parganas.
2. The State of West Bengal
_____Opposite Parties
The humble petition
of Criminal Revision on behalf of the Revisionist / Petitioner, most
respectfully;
Sheweth as under :
- That
an application under Section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code’ 1973, has
been filed by the Opposite Party no.1, herein, Vide Case no. ACM Case No.
834 of 2018, wherein she claiming her interim maintenance from her alleged
husband Revisionist as of Rs. 30,000/- ( Rupees Thirty Thousand ) only per
month for herself before the Learned 3rd Court of Judicial
Magistrate, at Alipore, South 24 Parganas.
- That
the said interim application under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. has been heard
by the Learned Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court, at Alipore,
South 24 Parganas, and whereas the Revisionist has filed his Written
Objection therein, and thereafter the Learned Judicial Magistrate, 3rd
Court, at Alipore, South 24 Parganas, passed necessary order as on 27th
day of September’ 2019.
- Being
aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the Order dated 27th day of
September’ 2019, passed by Smt. A. Chatterjee, Judicial Magistrate, 3rd
Court, Alipore, South 24 Parganas, in A.C.M. Case no. 834 of 2018, under
Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code’ 1973, the Revisionist /
Petitioner prefer this Criminal Revision application on the following
amongst other :
GROUND
I)
FOR
THAT the Order of the Learned Lower
Court is improper, erroneous and otherwise bad in law;
II)
FOR
THAT the order of the Learned Lower Court is against the facts, circumstances
and probability of the case and is against the weight of evidence on record;
III)
FOR
THAT the order of Learned Lower Court is against the provisions of Law being
based upon mere conjectures and surmises;
IV)
FOR
THAT the Learned Lower Court did not consider the spirit of the provisions of
Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code’ 1973, nor consider the factual
aspects of the Revisionist / petitioner seeking for the dismissal of such
application;
V)
FOR
THAT the then the Revisionist was engaged as an Ordinary Labour in Dubai, and
thereby earning as of INR 8,000/- ( Rupees Eight Thousand ) per month, and
whereas the Revisionist taken leave of one month for his marriage in his
services at Dubai, therefore the Revisionist was with the Opposite Party no.1,
for the period of one month only in India, at Kolkata and thus the Revisionist
departed Country on 11-03-2017, for his Service in Dubai. During such period
the Opposite Party no.1, and the Revisionist stayed and live together as
husband wife, and due consummation performed by and between them;
VI)
FOR
THAT while the Revisionist was in Dubai, he used to send money separately to
the Opposite Party no.1, via western union money transfer and other available
modes as permissible in our country, thereof;
VII)
FOR
THAT the Revisionist consisting family member having old aged father, mother,
one unmarried Sister, and one Divorcee Sister with her one minor male child,
and therefore the Revisionist assailed his moral duty to look after his family
member, who particularly old aged dependent and unmarried Sister, and thus the Revisionist
in his meagre earning accommodated need of each and every family member
particularly the basic need of their livelihood;
VIII) FOR THAT the Revisionist back
to Kolkata, India only on 2nd day of July’ 2018, and thus since the
period commencing from 11th day of March’ 2017 to the day of 2nd
July’ 2018, the Revisionist was not in Kolkata and he was in Dubai in his
services as Ordinary Labour, and thereby in his meagre earning accommodate need
of his family members;
IX)
FOR
THAT the Opposite Party no.1, using whatsapp and facebook, wherein contain so
money photograph in such duration, while the revisionist was in Dubai, more
particularly in the month of July’ 2017, then the revisionist while seeing such
posts with another guys, asked the opposite party no.1, then the opposite party
no.1, got aroused and did not answer on his query, however after few days, the opposite
party no.1, went to her parental house on plea to her normal visit to meet with
her parents, and thereafter She did not return to her matrimonial home;
X)
FOR
THAT the Opposite Party no.1, withdrawn herself from the society of the revisionist
at her own whims and without any sufficient cause thereof, and consequently
insisting for Divorce to the revisionist, herein;
XI)
For
that this is the Opposite Party no.1, who lead adulterous life with some other
guys as apprehended in given circumstances, and for such circumstances she
withdrawn herself from the society of the revisionist.
XII) FOR THAT Since the Opposite
Party no.1, failed to perform her matrimonial bondage with the revisionist and
his family members, she failed to ask for anything which may be permissible to
a prudent wife;
XIII) FOR THAT Since 2nd
day of July’ 2018, to till presently, the Revisionist is without any job and
unemployed and thus in much hardship to run his family including himself and
therefore dependent on his friend, relatives, and other member of his society,
who time and again are trying to help him out;
XIV) FOR THAT the Learned Lower
Court did not consider and nor even apply judicial mind in granting and fixing
the quantum of maintenance;
XV) FOR THAT the Learned Judicial
Magistrate, ought to have rejected the prayer for maintenance of the Opposite
Party no.1, considering the facts that there has been no just cause or reason
for living separately and claiming maintenance for herself;
XVI) FOR THAT the impugned order of
the Learned Lower Court, is carrying much hardship to the Revisionist /
petitioner herein, as such the quantum of the maintenance is very high and
improper and beyond the ability of the Revisionist / petitioner herein, under
the factual circumstances;
XVII) FOR THAT it is not permissible
for any Magistrate under the Code to act contrary to the provisions of the Code’
1973;
XVIII) FOR THAT the order dated 27th
September’ 2019, passed by Smt. A. Chatterjee, Judicial Magistrate, 3rd
Court, Alipore, South 24 Parganas, in A.C.M. Case no. 834 of 2018, under
Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code’ 1973, was illegal, irregular, and
improper, in view of facts and circumstances, and contravene the spirit of the
provisions of the legislature.
4.
That the Revisionist petitioner seeks that the
said order dated 27th September’ 2019, passed by Smt. A. Chatterjee,
Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court, Alipore, South 24 Parganas, in
A.C.M. Case no. 834 of 2018, under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code’
1973, should be set aside, in the interest of administration of justice.
5.
That the Revisionist Petitioner states that no
other Criminal revision petition has ever been filed either before the Learned
Court or in the Hon’ble High Court at Calcutta. This Petition is first time in
this Learned Court seeking relief against the order dated 27th
September’ 2019, passed by Smt. A. Chatterjee, Judicial Magistrate, 3rd
Court, Alipore, South 24 Parganas, in A.C.M. Case no. 834 of 2018, under
Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code’ 1973.
6.
That the Revisionist Petitioner, enclosing
herewith the Original Certified Copy of the Order dated order dated 27th
September’ 2019, passed by Smt. A. Chatterjee, Judicial Magistrate, 3rd
Court, Alipore, South 24 Parganas, in A.C.M. Case no. 834 of 2018, under
Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code’ 1973, for the kind references of
the Learned Court.
7.
That
the Opposite Party Petitioner Crave leave to argue the law points as well as
facts and to produce the relevant documents and papers at the time of hearing
of this Revision petition, before the Learned Court.
8.
That
this application of revision made bonafide in the interest of justice.
On the ground
stated above and more to be argued at the time of hearing, it is, therefore,
prayed that Your Honour may graciously be pleased to admit this revision
petition, call for record of the Court below and after hearing the parties, be
pleased to set aside the order dated 27th September’ 2019, passed by
Smt. A. Chatterjee, Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court, Alipore, South
24 Parganas, in A.C.M. Case no. 834 of 2018, under Section 125 of the Criminal
Procedure Code’ 1973, and to stay the operation of the impugned order dated 27th
September’ 2019, passed by Smt. A. Chatterjee, Judicial Magistrate, 3rd
Court, Alipore, South 24 Parganas, in A.C.M. Case no. 834 of 2018, under
Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code’ 1973, till the disposal of this
revision application, and to prevail the interest of Administration of Justice;
And / or to pass
such other necessary order or further order or orders as your Honour may deem,
fit, and proper for the end of justice.
And for this act of kindness,
the Petitioner, as in duty bound shall ever pray.
Verification
I, within named Revisionist
Petitioner, made this criminal revision petition. I am acquainted and
conversant with the material facts, as stated in my revision application, and
duly verified on the _____________2020, at Alipore Judges’ Court, Alipore,
South 24 Parganas.
Md. Shakil @ Md. Aqeel Asrari
Identified by me,
Advocate.
Prepared in my Chamber,
Advocate.
Dated : _____________________2020.
Place : Alipore, South 24
Parganas.
Affidavit
I, Md. Shakil @ Md. Aqeel
Asrari, Son of Md. Ayub Asrari, aged about ____years, by faith Muslim, by
Occupation unemployed, residing at premises being no. T-170, Mitha Talab, Post
Office – Badartala, Police Station – Rajabagan, Kolkata - 700013, District –
South 24 Parganas, do hereby solemnly affirm and says as follows :
1 : That I am the Revisionist
petitioner and as such I am fully conversant with the facts of the Case, and I
am competent to swear this affidavit.
2 : That the contents of
paragraph no. ______to ______, are true to my knowledge and belief, and the
rests are my humble submissions before the Learned Court.
The above statements are true
to my knowledge and belief.
Deponent
Identified by me,
Advocate.
Prepared
in my Chamber,
Advocate.
Dated
: _____________________2020.
Place
: Alipore, South 24 Parganas.
N O T A R Y
VAKALATNAMA
District
: South 24-Parganas.
In the Court of
the Learned District Session Judge, at Alipore, South 24-Parganas.
Cri. Motion no.
_________________of 2020.
Md.
Shakil @ Md. Aqeel Asrari, __________Revisionist
-
Versus
–
Saba
Afreen, and others _________Opposite
Parties.
KNOW
ALL MEN by
these presents that I / We
Md. Shakil @ Md. Aqeel Asrari, Son of Md. Ayub Asrari, of T-170, Mitha Talab,
Post Office – Badartala, Police Station – Rajabagan, Kolkata - 700013,
do hereby constitute and appoint the
under mentioned Advocate, Pleader, Vakils, jointly and each of them severally
to be pleader of take such steps and proceedings as may be necessary on my /
our behalf and for that purpose to make sign, verify and present all necessary
petitions, plaints, written statements and other documents and do nominate and
appoint or retain senior counsels, vakil, advocates and other persons, lodge
and deposits moneys and documents and other papers in the Ld. Court and the
same again withdraw and to take out of Court and to obtain or grant as the case
may be effectual receipts and discharge for the same and for all moneys which
may be payable to me / us in the premises. To enter into compromise with my /
our approval and withdraw, all moneys from the court AND GENERALLY to act in the premises and proceedings
arising there out whether by way of execution, review, appeal, or otherwise or
in any manner contested there with as effectually and to all intents and
purpose as I / We could act if personally present and such substitution and as
pleasure to revoke I / We hereby ratifying and agreeing to confirm whatever may
be lawfully done by virtue hereof.
In witness whereof this Vakalatnama
has been executed by me / us.
This the …………………day of ………………2020.
Sri
Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate.
Sri
Rabindra Nath Das, Advocate.
Sri Biplab Some, Advocate.
Miss Mou Biswas, Advocate.
No comments:
Post a Comment