IN THE
COURT OF LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE ( SENIOR
DIVISION)
AT BARUIPUR,
SOUTH 24 PARGANAS.
TITLE SUIT NO.
____ OF 2019.
Shri
Amar Naskar, Son of Shri Bankim Naskar, residing
at Village – Khurigachhi, Post Office – Sonarpur, Kolkata – 700 150, Police
Station – Narendrapur, District – 24 Parganas South, West Bengal.
……PLAINTIFF.
-VERSUS-
1)
Shri
Shankar Naskar, Son of Shri Bankim Naskar, residing at Village – Khurigachhi,
Post Office – Sonarpur, Police Station – Narendrapur, Kolkata – 700 150, District
– 24 Parganas South.
2)
Shri
Ramesh Naskar, Son of Shri Bankim Naskar, residing at Village – Khurigachhi,
Post Office – Sonarpur, Police Station – Narendrapur, Kolkata – 700 150, District
– 24 Parganas South.
3)
Smt.
Pratima Kayal, Wife of Badal Kayal, residing at Village – Tangrakhali, Post
Office – Taldi, Police Station – canning, PIN Code – 743376, District – South
24 Parganas.
4)
Smt.
Ashima Mondal, Wife of Shri Bhulu Mondal, residing at Village – Tangrakhali (
Adla ), Post Office – Taldi, PIN Code – 743376, Police Station – canning,
District – South 24 Parganas.
5)
Smt.
Sushma Mondal, Wife of Shri Ashok Mondal, residing at Village – Bidyadharpur
Petua, Post Office – Sonarpur, PIN Code – 700 150, Police Station – Sonarpur,
District – South 24 Parganas.
6)
Smt.
Anima Mondal, Wife of Shri Samir Mondal, residing at Village – Malipukur,
Vidyadharpur, Post Office – Sonarpur, PIN Code – 700 150, Police Station –
Sonarpur, District – South 24 Parganas.
7)
Shri
Bankim Naskar, Son of Late Akshay Naskar, residing at Village – Khurigachhi, Post
Office – Sonarpur, Kolkata – 700 150, Police Station – Narendrapur, District –
24 Parganas South.
…DEFENDANTS
SUIT FOR PARTITION AND INJUNCTION
VALUED AT Rs. 99,000/- for
Partition AND Rs. 100/= Tentatively fixed for Injunction. TOTAL Rs. 99,100/=
The Plaintiff states as
follows:-
1. That one Bankim Naskar, Amar
Naskar, Shankar Naskar, Ramesh Naskar, Pratima Kayal, Ashima Mondal, Sushma
Mondal, Anima Mondal, who inherited the property left by Akshasy Naskar, each having 1/8th share on the said property and jointly
enjoying and possessing the said property.
2. That the defendants are enjoying
and possessing undivided 1/8th
share of Mouza – Khurigachhi, J.L. no. 21, RS Khatian no. 346, South 24
Parganas, Police Station – Sonarpur, presently Narendrapur Police Station, Dag
no. 766 – Danga – out of 9 Satak – 1 Satak, Dag no. 796 – Bastu – out of 25
Satak – 4 ghar – 9 Satak, Dag no. 822 – Shali – out of 16 Satak – 5 Satak, Dag
no. 819 – Shali – out of 25 Satak – 8 Satak ( Pukur ), Dag no. 786 – Shali –
out of 5 Satak – 2 Satak, Dag no. 184 – Shali – out of 22 Satak – 11 Satak,
Total - 36 Satak, and property and the plaintiff is enjoying and possessing
undivided 1/8th share of
premises being Mouza – Khurigachhi, J.L. no. 21, RS Khatian no. 346, South 24
Parganas, Police Station – Sonarpur, presently Narendrapur Police Station, Dag
no. 766 – Danga – out of 9 Satak – 1 Satak, Dag no. 796 – Bastu – out of 25
Satak – 4 ghar – 9 Satak, Dag no. 822 – Shali – out of 16 Satak – 5 Satak, Dag
no. 819 – Shali – out of 25 Satak – 8 Satak ( Pukur ), Dag no. 786 – Shali –
out of 5 Satak – 2 Satak, Dag no. 184 – Shali – out of 22 Satak – 11 Satak,
Total - 36 Satak, and property, in the above noted property.
3. The
Plaintiff states that the Defendants are trying to demarcate the Schedule
Property amongst themselves and are
trying to sell the Schedule Property and trying to deliver possession to third
party without giving any opportunity and without any notice to the Plaintiff
who by virtue of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, is entitled to get 1/8th
share in the undivided and
un-partitioned schedule property and said Property has not yet partitioned by
mates and bound amongst the co-sharers till now but the Defendants illegally
trying to demarcate the schedule property and illegally trying to sell the
undivided and un-partitioned schedule property to the third party and also
illegally and unlawfully trying to deliver possession over the undivided and
un-partitioned schedule property. Unless and until the undivided and
un-partitioned schedule property, is
partitioned by mates and bound, the Defendant cannot demarcate the premises and
cannot deliver possession to any third
party in view of the reported judgment
of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.
4. Recently
the Defendants forcefully trying to get possession in the undivided and
un-partitioned schedule property and illegally trying to make boundary wall in
the undivided and un-partitioned schedule property for which the Plaintiff
lodged a complaint to the Local Police Station. By the aforesaid
illegal acts of the Defendant cloud has been casted
to the right, title, interest and/or possession of the plaintiff in respect the
Schedule suit property which should be removed by appropriate order of the
court.
5. The
Plaintiff severally requested the Defendant to partition of the Suit property
by mates and bound among the Plaintiff and Defendants mutually and amicable so
that each of them get the actual share of the suit schedule property equally
i.e. 1/8th share of Mouza
– Khurigachhi, J.L. no. 21, RS Khatian no. 346, South 24 Parganas, Police
Station – Sonarpur, presently Narendrapur Police Station, Dag no. 766 – Danga –
out of 9 Satak – 1 Satak, Dag no. 796 – Bastu – out of 25 Satak – 4 ghar – 9
Satak, Dag no. 822 – Shali – out of 16 Satak – 5 Satak, Dag no. 819 – Shali –
out of 25 Satak – 8 Satak ( Pukur ), Dag no. 786 – Shali – out of 5 Satak – 2
Satak, Dag no. 184 – Shali – out of 22 Satak – 11 Satak, Total - 36 Satak, and
property,
within the Jurisdiction of Narendrapur Police Station in the District of South 24
Parganas.
But the Defendants openly refused to partition the suit schedule property
mutually and amicably among themselves.
6. As the
Defendants refused to partition the suit schedule property mutually and
amicably by mates and bounds, so the Plaintiff has been constrained to
institute the instant suit for partition to get his share of property
being Premises bearing Mouza – Khurigachhi,
J.L. no. 21, RS Khatian no. 346, South 24 Parganas, Police Station – Sonarpur,
presently Narendrapur Police Station, Dag no. 766 – Danga – out of 9 Satak – 1
Satak, Dag no. 796 – Bastu – out of 25 Satak – 4 ghar – 9 Satak, Dag no. 822 –
Shali – out of 16 Satak – 5 Satak, Dag no. 819 – Shali – out of 25 Satak – 8
Satak ( Pukur ), Dag no. 786 – Shali – out of 5 Satak – 2 Satak, Dag no. 184 –
Shali – out of 22 Satak – 11 Satak, Total - 36 Satak, and property,
within the Jurisdiction of Narendrapur Police Station in the District of South
24 Parganas, properly through Court.
7. The
Plaintiff served one Legal notice through his Learned Advocate, seeking thereby
amicable partition of the Premises bearing Mouza – Khurigachhi, J.L. no. 21, RS
Khatian no. 346, South 24 Parganas, Police Station – Sonarpur, presently
Narendrapur Police Station, Dag no. 766 – Danga – out of 9 Satak – 1 Satak, Dag
no. 796 – Bastu – out of 25 Satak – 4 ghar – 9 Satak, Dag no. 822 – Shali – out
of 16 Satak – 5 Satak, Dag no. 819 – Shali – out of 25 Satak – 8 Satak ( Pukur
), Dag no. 786 – Shali – out of 5 Satak – 2 Satak, Dag no. 184 – Shali – out of
22 Satak – 11 Satak, Total - 36 Satak, and property,
within the Jurisdiction of Narendrapur Police Station in the District of South
24 Parganas, with the defendants. The Legal notice vide Ref. no. AKS / AN / 1869
/ 19, dated 28th day of January’ 2019, served through the registered
Speed Post, the track report of the Postal Authority shows due services on the
defendants.
8. The
Defendants are in receipt of the Legal Notice for amicable partition of the Premises
bearing Mouza –
Khurigachhi, J.L. no. 21, RS Khatian no. 346, South 24 Parganas, Police Station
– Sonarpur, presently Narendrapur Police Station, Dag no. 766 – Danga – out of
9 Satak – 1 Satak, Dag no. 796 – Bastu – out of 25 Satak – 4 ghar – 9 Satak,
Dag no. 822 – Shali – out of 16 Satak – 5 Satak, Dag no. 819 – Shali – out of
25 Satak – 8 Satak ( Pukur ), Dag no. 786 – Shali – out of 5 Satak – 2 Satak,
Dag no. 184 – Shali – out of 22 Satak – 11 Satak, Total - 36 Satak, and
property,
within the Jurisdiction of Narendrapur Police Station in the District of South
24 Parganas, West Bengal, though he did not respond anything and did not even
reply to such notice.
9. The cause of
action of the instant suit arose in
respect of Premises bearing
Mouza – Khurigachhi, J.L. no. 21, RS Khatian no. 346, South 24 Parganas, Police
Station – Sonarpur, presently Narendrapur Police Station, Dag no. 766 – Danga –
out of 9 Satak – 1 Satak, Dag no. 796 – Bastu – out of 25 Satak – 4 ghar – 9
Satak, Dag no. 822 – Shali – out of 16 Satak – 5 Satak, Dag no. 819 – Shali –
out of 25 Satak – 8 Satak ( Pukur ), Dag no. 786 – Shali – out of 5 Satak – 2
Satak, Dag no. 184 – Shali – out of 22 Satak – 11 Satak, Total - 36 Satak, and
property,
within the Jurisdiction of Narendrapur Police Station in the District of South 24
Parganas, of undivided and
un-partitioned , morefully described in the Schedule hereunder
written which is within jurisdiction of this Learned Court and on and from the date the Plaintiff came to know that the
Defendants are trying to sell some portion of undivided and un-partitioned
schedule property and when the said defendants trying to demarcating the Suit
Property illegally and unlawfully and trying to get illegal possession in the
schedule property forcefully more than his shares and subsequent thereto time
to time.
10.
This Court has the ample jurisdiction to try
and dispose of the instant suit for partition.
11.
Accordingly the plaintiff claims for decree for
partition in the preliminary form
declaring the respective share of the respective parties by mates and bound in
the schedule property.
12.
The Plaintiff further claims for Administration
and consequential reliefs in the schedule suit property.
13.
For the purpose of jurisdiction and the Court
Fees the suit is valued at Rs. 99,000/= for Partition and Rs. 100/= for
Injunction and the ad-velorem Court fees is paid herewith.
The
plaintiff accordingly prays for the following reliefs:
a.
Preliminary Decree for partition declaring the
share of the Plaintiff in respect of the suit property;
b.
Certain time be given to the Plaintiff to make amicable partition in terms of the
preliminary Decree and in the failure of the same a Survey passed Advocate
Commissioner be appointed for effecting partition and on his Report a Final
Decree be passed;
c.
A decree for permanent Injunction;
d.
Receiver over the suit property;
e.
Commission;
f.
Cost and other charges of the suit;
g.
Such other relief or reliefs as the learned
court may deem fit and proper.
SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY REFERRED TO
ALL
THAT piece and parcel of Mouza
– Khurigachhi, J.L. no. 21, RS Khatian no. 346, South 24 Parganas, Police
Station – Sonarpur, presently Narendrapur Police Station, Dag no. 766 – Danga –
out of 9 Satak – 1 Satak, Dag no. 796 – Bastu – out of 25 Satak – 4 ghar – 9
Satak, Dag no. 822 – Shali – out of 16 Satak – 5 Satak, Dag no. 819 – Shali –
out of 25 Satak – 8 Satak ( Pukur ), Dag no. 786 – Shali – out of 5 Satak – 2
Satak, Dag no. 184 – Shali – out of 22 Satak – 11 Satak, Total - 36 Satak, and
property,
within the Jurisdiction of Narendrapur Police Station in the District of South
24 Parganas, West Bengal.
V E R I F I C A T I O N
I the plaintiff do hereby declare that I
verify for and say that the statement made in paragraphs No. 1 to _____ are
true to the best of my knowledge and paragraphs No. ___ to
____ the rest are my humble submission before this Learned Court.
I
signed the verification
on
this day of 2019
at the
Court Premises.
A F F I D A V I T
I
Shri Amar Naskar, Son of Shri Bankim Naskar, aged about _______years, by
faith Hindu, by Occupation _________________residing at Village – Khurigachhi, Post Office –
Sonarpur, Kolkata – 700 150, Police Station – Narendrapur, District – 24
Parganas South, West Bengal, do hereby affirm and say as follows:
1. That I am the plaintiff and am well
conversant with the facts and circumstances of the case and am competent to
affirm this affidavit for myself.
2.
I say that the statement made in paragraphs No:
1 to _____ are true to the best of my knowledge and paragraph No. _____ to ____ the rest are my humble submission
before this Learned Court.
Deponent
Prepared
in my office Identified by me
Advocate Advocate
NOTARY
THE PLAINTIFF RELIED UPON THE FOLLOWINGS
DOCUMENTS:
1.
Legal Notice being Ref. no. AKS / AN / 1869 / 19, dated 28th day of
January’ 2019, Postal receipts, and
Track report;
2. Parcha;
5.
Other documents.
THE PLAINTIFFS FILED HEREWITH THE
FOLLOWINGS DOCUMENTS:
1.
Legal Notice being Ref. no. AKS / AN / 1869 / 19, dated 28th day of
January’ 2019, Postal receipts, and
Track report,
2. Parcha;
5.
Other documents.
No comments:
Post a Comment