A shared household is a household belonging to a
husband’s relative where the wife has lived in a domestic relationship:
A shared household
would only mean the house belonging to or taken on rent by the husband, or the
house which belongs to the joint family of which the husband is a member. The
respondent in a proceeding under Domestic Violence Act can be any relative of the
husband. In event, the shared household belongs to any relative of the husband
with whom in a domestic relationship the woman has lived, the conditions
mentioned in Section 2(s) are satisfied and the said house will become a shared
household. There is no such requirement that the house may be owned singly or
jointly by the husband or taken on rent by the husband and the same was upheld
by High Court of Delhi through the learned bench led
by Justice Yogesh Khanna in the case of RAVNEET
KAUR vs. PRITHPAL SINGH DHINGRA [RFA 832/2018] on 24.02.2022.
The facts of the
case are that the respondent claims to be an absolute and sole owner of the
property vide a registered sale deed. He filed a suit for eviction against the
defendant viz. his daughter-in-law. A decree of possession with damages
equivalent to the market rent of the alleged illegal possession was passed
against the appellant and also a decree of permanent injunction to restrain her
from creating any third party right in such property.
It is the case of
the appellant she being a legally wedded wife of respondent’s son has been
residing with her two minor daughters in the property. This appeal is filed for
setting aside the impugned judgment that the property was a self-acquired
property of the respondent.
The appellant’s
counsel submitted that the said property was purchased out of joint family
funds and from sale proceeds of the ancestral property and after the death of
S. Kesar Singh the subject property was purchased by the respondent from such
ancestral funds, hence the suit property is a joint family property in which
the appellant has also a right to reside.
In view of the
facts and circumstances, the Court held that it would be appropriate if an
alternative accommodation is provided to the appellant as per Section 19(1)(f)
of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.
The Court observed,
“The respondent in a proceeding under Domestic Violence Act can be any relative
of the husband. In event, the shared household belongs to any relative of the
husband with whom in a domestic relationship the woman has lived, the
conditions mentioned in Section 2(s) are satisfied and the said house will
become a shared household. There is no such requirement that the house may be
owned singly or jointly by the husband or taken on rent by the husband.”
No comments:
Post a Comment