Thursday, July 7, 2022

Nullity of Marriage in India

 

Nullity of Marriage in India

Marriage is an agreement to be united to a person of the opposite sex as a wife or a husband in a legal, consensual, and contractual relationship recognized and sanctioned, and dissolvable only by law. Marriage is a state of being accepted and acknowledged by society and religion, between a man and a woman, who are termed husband and wife, respectively. Marriage is also referred as a contract between man and woman to live life together as husband and wife, marriage is a religious sacrament. In India, a marriage is a legal status under different personal laws, followed in India, like Hindu Marriage Act, Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, 1955, Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872, Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936, and Special Marriage Act 1954.

Nullity of Marriage

Nullity, in general, means an act that is legally void in nature. In case of a marriage, it means a legal statement by the family court that there was the marriage didn’t exist between two people, and marriage was not valid. The declaration makes it clear that the marriage never took place.

Difference Between Nullity of Marriage, Divorce and Judicial Separation

Though nullity, divorce and judicial separation are ways to end a marriage, but they are not similar. There are differences between these three.

Nullity of Marriage

As mentioned, the nullity of marriage is a legal declaration that marriage was not in existence. It points out the validity of marriage according to law it was performed. This means that there was not a valid marriage has performed between the parties; either the parties or the circumstance is not valid by the law.

Divorce

A divorce is a formal ending of a marriage. It is a legal declaration on the petition by the parties of the marriage, that led to an end of a valid marriage. Under a divorce, the validity of the marriage is not questioned, but it questions the continuation of marriage. If successful, it ends a valid marriage. A divorce is more permanent than nullity and judicial separation.

Judicial Separation

A judicial separation is declared legally on request of the parties that they must be allowed living separately under the status of marriage. It is not an end of a marriage; neither it questions the validity of the marriage. Under Judicial separation, duties and liabilities remain the same for both the parties.

Nullity of Marriage Under Different Personal Laws in India

Under Hindu law

Hindu laws are based upon two sources ancient sources and modern sources. The ancient sources are Shruti, Smriti, Digests and Commentaries, and Customs. The modern sources are Justice, Equity, and Good Conscience, Precedent, and Legislation.

The marriage, according to Smrities, is an essential sanskar. Smriti says it is a must duty to everyone to perform. Earlier marriage was undissolvable, and it was necessary to perform religious and spiritual responsibility. Before the parliamentary enactment, there was no concept of the ending a marriage or nullity of marriage under Hindu personal law, as it was treated as holy wedlock for the whole life.

After application of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, now there are certain grounds on which marriage shall be declared null and void. These grounds are mentioned under Section 5, clause (i), (iv) and (v), The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. These grounds are as follow:

  1. In case any of the party has a living spouse at the time of marriage
  2. At the time of the marriage:
    1. None of the party should be incapable of giving a valid consent to it in consequence of unsoundness of mind;
    2. Though capable of giving valid consent, neither party has been suffering from any kind of mental disorder or to any extent be unfit for marriage and the procreation of children.
    3. Neither of the party has been subject to recurrent attacks of insanity
  3. The bridegroom has completed the 21 years of age and the bride must have completed the age of 18 at the time of the marriage.
  4. Both the parties should not fall within the degrees of any prohibited relationship under the Hindu law unless the custom or usage governing each of them allows marriage between the parties.
  5. Both the parties should not belong to same sapindas unless the custom or usage governing each of them allows marriage between the parties.
  6. Sagotra marriage is valid under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Termed as voidable marriages, few marriages are also valid till declared null and void. A voidable marriage is annulled by the decree of nullity under section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Under voidable marriages, it is the complete discretion of the parties to continue with marriage or to annul marriage by a decree of the court.

The grounds for voidable marriage are:

  • In case the respondent is impotent
  • In case of incapacity to give valid consent or forced consent of parties or mental illness or person unfit for procreation of a child
  • Underaged marriage
  • If the respondent was pregnant by some other person at the time of marriage.

Nullity of Marriage Under Muslim Personal Law

Under Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, a marriage is a dissoluble contract between two parties of the opposite sex. A contract, where valid consent of both the parties is required, and ‘Mehar’ is also decided. Therefore dissolution of marriage is also permitted in both the Shias and Sunnis. Without a valid consent by the parties or their guardian, a marriage is void, according to the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939. These are the following grounds for dissolution of marriage under Muslim Personal Law:

  • Interreligious marriage to a woman who does not have religious status (a Muslim male also cannot marry a female who does not follow Islam)
  • Marriage between milk relation or ‘Maharam’ close blood relatives
  • Marriage with a person who renounces Islam or not having faith in Islam
  • In Sunnis conditional or interim marriage is void
  • Marriage to a woman in her Iddat period
  • In case the conditions of marriage are against Islam

Nullity of Marriage Under Christian Law in India

Christianity also does not allow a separation. Hence, marriage is indissoluble and holy wedlock that makes it a public religious ceremony. Therefore, it is difficult to grant a nullity of marriage. However, for the sake of the development of society and to save the Indian Christians from discrimination, there is separate marital law Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872. The act was enacted and for their divorce. Indian Christians also follow the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, for nullity of marriage.

In the year 2001, The Indian Divorce Act 1869 was amended and the grounds for nullity of a marriage under the act are:

  • In case the respondent was impotent at the time of marriage and also at the time of institution of the suit.
  • Bigamy: Either of the party has living husband or wife at the time of marriage and that marriage is in force
  • Marriage between the persons within the prohibited degree of consanguinity or affinity
  • Either party was lunatic at the time of marriage.

Nullity of Marriage Under Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936

The Parsi community in India follows there separate act for marital laws. According to Section 30 of the act, in any case, in which consummation of the marriage by natural causes is impossible, such marriage may, at the instance of either party thereto, be declared to be null and void.

Nullity of Marriage Under Special Marriage Act, 1954

According to Section 24 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 on the petition of either of the party, a marriage can be declared null and void by the decree of nullity. Following are the grounds for it:

  • Either party has a living spouse
  • Either party was incapable of giving valid consent due to unsoundness of mind or mental illness or unfit to the procreation of children
  • Parties are under aged
  • Parties are in a relation of a prohibited degree
  • Impotency of respondent

Other Grounds to Declare Voidable Marriage Null and Void Under Special Marriage Act, 1954

  • Due to willful refusal of the respondent, marriage not been consummated
  • Pregnancy of the respondent by some other person at the time of marriage
  • Consent of any of the party was gained by fraud or coercion as defined in the Indian Contract Act, 1872

Procedure to Obtaining Decree of Nullity of Marriage

The procedure of obtaining a decree of the Nullity of Marriage under all personal laws in India is almost similar.

  • The petition should be presented before the court (Concerned courts under different personal laws: Under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and Special Marriage Act, 1954 Family court or city civil court decides the matter. Under the Muslim law, matter does not decide by the court but matter decided by the religious practice (Under the Parsi law court means the court established under the act).
  • The jurisdiction of the concerned court will decide where the defendant or respondent resides.
  • The court issue notice to the respondent or defendant to give a reply before the court.
  • Court grants relief accordingly, after hearing and evidence.

Maintenance Under of Nullity of Marriage

Acting upon the petition submitted, when the court declares nullity of a marriage, it also decides the maintenance to be given to the opposite party, either in a lump sum amount, or yearly or monthly.

Legitimacy of Children Born Out of Null Marriage 

According to Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 grants legitimacy for the children born out of a void marriage. This particular section protects the children born out of void marriages and prevents them from being bastardised.

 

Man has to maintain wife till nullity of marriage

 

Man has to maintain wife till nullity of marriage;

The man had challenged a magisterial court's interim maintenance order on the grounds that his estranged wife was already married before marrying him.

A married woman is entitled to benefits and protection under the domestic violence law until her husband gets a decree of nullity of their marriage, a Delhi court has said. The sessions court made the law clear to a man, who had challenged a magisterial court’s order directing him to pay an interim maintenance of Rs 5,000 to his estranged wife on the grounds that the woman was already married before marrying him.

“I am of the view that until and unless the man did not get decree of nullity of marriage with the woman, as divorce petition under the Hindu Marriage Act has already been filed, she is entitled for benefits and protection under Domestic Violence Act as the Act is benevolent in favour of a woman,” Additional Sessions Judge Jagdish Kumar said. The court dismissed the man’s appeal, saying there was no illegality, infirmity or impropriety in the order of trial court and it was an interim order of maintenance which could be modified at the time of final disposal of main petition.

The man challenged the trial court order, saying it had not considered the fact that his marriage with the woman was null and void from the beginning as she was already married to some other person. To this, the sessions court said even if this fact was accepted for the sake of an argument, the marriage of the woman with the other person “may be nullity ab-initio” under the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act as she asserted that he was her cousin brother.

“Then the marriage between the appellant man and the woman may subsist. Though, it is not within the jurisdiction of this court to give any opinion regarding the nullity or subsisting of marriage between the man and the woman but I am giving the observation only on the basis of averment in pleading, if same is admitted to be correct and same are only for the sake of argument,” the judge said.

The woman, in her petition seeking maintenance from her husband, had said that she got married to him in March 2013 and alleged that the man and his parents started harassing her just after few days of marriage. She also alleged that her husband and in-laws started demanding dowry and she was thrown out of her matrimonial house two months after marriage, i.e. in May 2013 after which she approached the court.

The man, in his appeal, also placed on record a marriage certificate of the woman with the other person purportedly issued by the registrar of Hindu marriages in Ghaziabad. The court, however, said mere production of a marriage certificate issued under the Special Marriage Act in support of her claimed first marriage was not sufficient.

Wednesday, July 6, 2022

Landowner can seek compensation from builder under law: SC

 

A landowner who signs a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with a builder to develop apartments on his land is a consumer, and can demand compensation under the Consumer Protection Act if the developer fails to complete the work in time, the Supreme Court has held.

The ruling provides relief to owners of small plots who often enter into collaborative agreements with builders to re-develop their properties. The understanding usually involves distribution of flats between the owner and the real-estate firm. In case of a dispute, the parties have to approach the trial court – where the proceedings may run for years on end.

A bench headed by Justice Dipak Misra delivered the judgment on a petition filed by Bunga Daniel Babu, a resident of Hyderabad.

In July 2004, Babu had signed an agreement with a firm for constructing a multi-storey building comprising five floors, elevator facilities and parking space. While 60% of the apartments were supposed to go to the builder, the owner could keep the remaining 40%. Under the agreement, the construction had to be completed within 19 months from the date of approval by the municipal corporation – failing which the developer had to pay Rs 2,000 for each apartment every month.

 

According to the petitioner, the builder delayed handing over the apartments by three years but did not pay the stipulated compensation. To claim the money, he dragged the builder to the district consumer forum and attempted to invoke the Consumer Protection Act.

Although the district forum declared Babu a consumer under the law, the state and national consumer panels did not agree. Both said the landowner had entered into a commercial contract with the builder, and the transaction wasn’t meant for something of personal use. “The MoU that the parties entered into does not even remotely indicate that it is a joint venture,” the bench said, sending the case back to the state commission for a decision on how much compensation Babu was entitled to.

 

Representation to West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (WBSEDCL)

 

 

Date : 5th day of July’ 2022

To,

1)   The Station Manager, West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (WBSEDCL), Garia, having its office at Garia Main Road, Kolkata – 700084, District South 24 Parganas.

 

2)   The Divisional Manager, West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (WBSEDCL), having its Garia Division, Garia Main Road, Kolkata – 700084, District South 24 Parganas.

 

3)   The Regional Manager, West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (WBSEDCL), having its Baruipur Regional Office, Mallickpur Opposite Church, Kolkata – 700144, District South 24 Parganas.

 

4)   The Chief Engineer ( Distribution), West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (WBSEDCL), having its office at 1st Floor, Vidyut Bhawan, Salt Lake, Kolkata – 700092.

 

Subject : Effect of construction of high rise building and use of electricity thereon, by M/s. Devaloke Developers Limited, having its Registered Office at Premises being no. 82, Garia Main Road, Mahamayatala, Post Office – Garia, Police Station – Naredrapur, Kolkata - 700084, and being represented by its Director namely one Sukanta Kundu, Swarup Kundu, Shankar Kundu, and Antara Guha Kundu.

 

 

Dear Sir/s, Madam/s,

Please take note that M/s. Devaloke Developers Limited, having its Registered Office at Premises being no. 82, Garia Main Road, Mahamayatala, Post Office – Garia, Police Station – Naredrapur, Kolkata – 700084, has been making construction on a vast plot of land under Mouza Jaganathpur, J.L. no. 51, Police Station Naredrapur, Post Office – Rakrishnapally, District South 24 Parganas, in the name and style “Devaloke Sonar City”, which is a project for making different High Rise Buildings. The particulars of the schedule of the plots under said Mouza Jaganathpur is furnished as follows;

Mouza with J.L. no. & P.S.

L.R. Khatian no.

RS Plot

LR PLot

Classification of Land

Jaganathpur, JL no. 51, P.S. Naredrapur

1257

440,441

482,483

Danga, Shali

 

 

443,442

485,484

Shali, Danga

 

 

421,417

463,459

Danga, Danga

 

 

450,451

491,492

Danga, Danga

 

 

454,457

495,498

Danga

 

 

435,416

477,458

Bagan, Bagan

 

 

452,455

493,496

Danga, Danga

 

 

458,460

499,501

Danga, Danga

 

 

449,412

490,454

Danga, Shali

 

 

434,439

476,481

Bagan, Danga

 

 

433,408

473,450

Bagan, Shali

 

 

418,453

460,494

Danga, Shali

 

 

464,459

505,500

Danga, Shali

 

 

445,447

487,488

Danga, Bagan

 

 

438,448

480,489

Shali, Shali

 

 

419

461

Danga, Bagan

 

The said plots of land are surrounded by agricultural land in one side and homestead land on the other.

Some buildings of private individuals are situated by the side Sonarpur Station Road, the said project of “Devaloke Sonar City” is just by the side of the said buildings of the individuals. The entire area was previously agricultural land. Still some portion are cultivated.

You have tried to connect the transformer situated on the said project through underground cable over which cultivable lands are situated. Because of high tension line, the agricultural land will be affected. You have not taken no objection from me and other land owners. As such your work is un-warranted and illegal. We are objecting to your said work and request you to restore our plots of land in original character and position.

 

This is for your information and immediate action.

 

Thanking you,

 

Yours’ faithfully,

 

 

Kamal Sardar,

Son of Year Ali Sardar,

Jagannathpur Bhangi Para,

Post Office – Ramkrishna Pally,

Police Station – Narendrapur,

Kolkata – 700150,

District South 24 Parganas

 

representation to WBRERA for cancellation of the Project

 

Date : 4th day of July’ 2022

To,

The West Bengal Real Estate Regulatory Authority, having its Office at Calcutta Greens Commercial Complex, 1st Floor, 1050/2, Survey Park, Santoshpur, Kolkata – 700075.

Ref.: HIRA/P/SOU/2018/000305 “DEVALOKE SONAR CITY” Simultala, Sonarpur Station Road, Holding no. 1117, under Ward no. 8, Rajpur Sonarpur Municipality, Post Office – Ramkrishna Pally, Police Station – Narendrapur, District South 24 Parganas.

Subject : Cancellation of the approval of Project Work “DEVALOKE SONAR CITY” Simultala, Sonarpur Station Road, Holding no. 1117, under Ward no. 8, Rajpur Sonarpur Municipality, Post Office – Ramkrishna Pally, Police Station – Narendrapur, District South 24 Parganas accorded to M/s. Devaloke Developers Limited, having its Registered Office at Premises being no. 82, Garia Main Road, Mahamayatala, Post Office – Garia, Police Station – Naredrapur, Kolkata - 700084, and being represented by its Director namely one Sukanta Kundu, Swarup Kundu, Shankar Kundu, and Antara Guha Kundu,  for their illegal and unauthorized construction in violation Title Suit no. 206 of 2022.

Sir/s,

I, Sri Kamal Sardar, Son of Year Ali Sardar, residing at Jagannathpur Bhangi Para, Post Office – Ramkrishna Pally, Police Station – Narendrapur, Kolkata – 700150, District South 24 Parganas, should like to state as follows;

1.   That I am the bonafide Owner of a Plot of Land measuring about 29 Decimal Land comprising of C.S. Dag no. 438 corresponding to R.S. Dag no. 438, corresponding to L.R. Dag no. 480 of C.S. Khatian no. 120, corresponding to R.S. Khatian no. 452, under Mouza Jaganathpur, Police Station – Narendrapur, District – South 24 Parganas.

 

2.   That I have never transferred my said property to anybody else. One Devaloke Developers Limited, having its Registered Office at Premises being no. 82, Garia Main Road, Mahamayatala, Post Office – Garia, Police Station – Naredrapur, Kolkata - 700084, and being represented by its Director namely one Sukanta Kundu, Swarup Kundu, Shankar Kundu, and Antara Guha Kundu, has started construction work encircling a huge area where under my said property situated.

 

3.   That kindly take note, I am in possession of my said property; but the said developer company twice tried to dispossess me from my property.  On the fear of dispossession, I made Written Complaint before the local Police Station.

 

4.   I have already filed a Civil Suit being T.S. no. 112 of 2022, before the Learned 2nd Civil Judge ( Senior Division) Baruipur, South 24 Parganas against the said developer, which is still pending and wherein by order dated 08-03-2022, the Learned Court 2nd Civil Judge ( Senior Division ) Baruipur, South 24 Parganas, has been pleased to allow the prayer of injunction and the parties therein have been ordered to maintain “status quo”. The said order of injunction has been extended from time to time and same is still in force.

 

5.   That I have already made representation before the concerned Municipality for cancellation of the sanctioned building plan, and for stoppage of ongoing construction work.

 

6.   That the said Developer in violation of the Title Suit no. 112 of 2022, is still continuing with the construction work.

 

7.   That reportedly the concerned Municipality has sanctioned the building plan in suit plot of land which belongs to me. I never gave them no objection for such construction on my own land. Pursuant to the said sanction, you have also approved the Project Work, in favour of the said Developer. Since the said Developer is making illegal and unauthorized construction as such you must withdraw your approval for continuation of the said Project Work.

 

In the circumstance I request you to cancel the Project namely “DEVALOKE SONAR CITY” already sanctioned in favour of the said developer and take necessary steps, for stopping construction work, which the said developer, is continuing.

 

In the circumstance I request you to take necessary steps restraining the said developer in carrying on further construction.

 

This is for your information and immediate action.

 

Thanking you,

 

Yours’ faithfully,

 

 

Kamal Sardar,

Son of Year Ali Sardar,

Jagannathpur Bhangi Para,

Post Office – Ramkrishna Pally,

Police Station – Narendrapur,

Kolkata – 700150,

District South 24 Parganas

 

Copy to ;

The Designated Authority,

The West Bengal Real Estate Regulatory Authority, having its Office at Calcutta Greens Commercial Complex, 1st Floor, 1050/2, Survey Park, Santoshpur, Kolkata – 700075.

{ for information and necessary action }